Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benscharl.dev

Benjamin Scharlemann · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
benjamin-staneck.com
Benjamin Staneck - hi.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
benjaminpolster.com
Benjamin Polster - Computer Science
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
therealwgm.com
Wegmann
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
cogsoz.com
Cogs' Kludge
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
mattjmann.com
Matthew Mann
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
ben.gy
Ben Richardson
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
benrichardson.dev
Ben Richardson
2 shared topicscomputing
62match
ajschmidt.com
AJ Schmidt | Home
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alexanderschroeter.net
Alexander Schröter
2 shared topicscomputing
61match
3cm.io
Permission error - 3CM
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
adventuresinrenaming.net
Adventures in Renaming
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
allschemas.com
All Schematics Download
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
2rnsc.com
2nd Renaissance – A blog on science, technology, engineering and systems
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
neurotechc.com
neurotech - Design Verification
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
dissonance.com
Martin Snelgrove - Dissonance Inc.
2 shared topicscomputing
61match
kylechard.com
Kyle Chard - University of Chicago
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
neurosillix.com
Empowering Intelligence in Silicon
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
adknnj.com
Xeams Admin Console - Version 10.2, build 6432
2 shared topicscomputing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.