Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benrogers.dev

Ben Rogers | Software Engineer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
82match
alfredojahn.dev
Alfredo Jahn | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
arthursena.com
sena | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
82match
ronydev.com
Rony Silva | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
fdaniall.com
Fakhri Danial | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
mattpetts.com
Matt Petts | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
81match
ropdias.dev
Rodrigo P. Dias | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dmasilva.com
David Owuor | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
dnhen.com
dnhen | software engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nezih.dev
Nezih | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
bnuckols.com
Brennon Nuckols | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
kushbhalodi.com
Kush Bhalodi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
nickreis.com
Nicholas Reis | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
somkene.com
Somkene Ojukwu | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
bobbyagnese.com
Bobby Agnese | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
favourakpasi.com
Favour Akpasi | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
arielfj.com
Ariel Fermín | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mashoado.com
Masho Ado | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
3raul.com
Senior Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.