Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benpatterson.net

Ben Patterson · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
agentpatterns.tech
Agent Patterns
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
68match
agentic-patterns.com
Awesome Agentic Patterns
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
66match
pinpatplace.com
Pinar Patton
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
bluestpanda.com
Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
piersonrileymarks.com
Pierson Marks
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
agentsdesign.dev
Agents Design — AI Agent Design Patterns & Best Practices
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
themopup.com
Machines on Paper
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
benharvey.org
Ben Harvey | Personal Website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
65match
robotpaper.ai
Robot Paper: AI Patterns, Anti Patterns & Techniques
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
felixpeng.com
Felix Peng | Personal Website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
benjaminrgregory.com
Ben Gregory
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
arloooo.com
Arlo - Personal Site
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
matteovillosio.com
Matteo Villosio Personal Blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
theproductperson.com
The Product Person
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
andyhz0210.com
Andy — personal page
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
neural-wire.com
NeuralWire — AI News That Matters
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
arjunkirtipatel.com
Arjun Patel Website
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
64match
alandao.net
Alan Dao's personal blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.