Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benpackard.org

Ben Packard · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
benlevy.me
Ben Levy
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
arisyagroup.com
Face Club Package
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
benpiggot.io
Ben Piggot
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
sonerguler.com
About
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
kuwaitdevs.com
Kuwait Developers
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
maxgirkins.com
Max Girkins
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
somethingawesomecorp.com
Joren Winge iOS Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
rolonatt.com
Rolo Natt - Apps, Bots & Tools I Build
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sonofnos.com
Chris Emeka
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
robkumar.com
Rob Kumar's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
gtmnayan.com
Home | Nayan Gautam
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
alexpagnotta.dev
Alex Pagnotta
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
matejaksa.com
Máté Jaksa - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
nextmotionlabs.com
Independent software studio specializing in development and consulting for small teams.
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
matteoperotta.com
Matteo Perotta – Software Developer, Computer Science Student. iOS App Maker.
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
piceno.dev
Piceno
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
socketio4j.com
Socketio4j Documentation | Socketio4j
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
64match
benc.io
Ben Cooper
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.