Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benmacpherson.dev

Ben M · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
benjaminford.dev
Ben Ford
2 shared topicsweb-development
67match
greenmangosystems.com
Green Mango Systems
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
greenmangosoftware.com
Green Mango Systems
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
bencarv.dev
Ben Carvalho — Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
66match
teteewansoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Tete Ewan Software Java Developers
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
boluwatife.dev
Bolu Adetifa
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
kwiatek.dev
Patryk Kwiatek
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
arrebol.io
Arrebol - IT
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
kunalraj.dev
Kunalraj Singh
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
maspearls.com
Maspearls | Software Developement Company
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
sonajen.com
Sonajen Oy
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
arjdad.com
Arjun Dadhwal - Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
inwarsoft.com
Inwarsoft
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
andy-yates-software.co.uk 🇬🇧
Andy Yates, Software Developer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
aneesharama.dev
Portfolio | Software Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
65match
box68.net
box68.net | Matthias Jell
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
uralsezer.com
Ural Sezer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
65match
gsadhwani.com
Garvit Sadhwani
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.