Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benjhowland.com

Ben j Howland · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
63match
benhoneywill.com
Ben Honeywill
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
robinmuhia.dev
Robin Mike Muhia | Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
maxdemaio.com
Home - Max DeMaio
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
benbeck.dev
Ben Beck - Software Engineer
3 shared topicsweb-development
62match
arlindohall.com
Miller Hall
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
angelomontil.dev
Angelo Montil · Independent product engineer & app maker
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
aboutjeremiah.tech
Jeremiah E | Software Engineer | Portfolio
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
arsenkolyba.com
Arsen Kolyba
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
bkdsw.com
Baked Software — Boutique Software Development, est. 2012
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
divyatman.com
Divyatman
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
dlibre.com
harsha pathuri
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
mattgeimer.com
Matt Geimer
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
softwareonbudget.com
Software on budget
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
themohit.dev
Mohit | Software Developer & Tech Enthusiast
3 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
61match
davidazar.mx 🇲🇽
David Azar
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
abdelhamide.dev
Abdelhamid's website
3 shared topicsweb-development
61match
benchurchill.dev
Ben Churchill | Product-Focused Software Developer
3 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
arronwoods.com
Arron Woods - Software Engineer, UK | Arron Woods
3 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.