Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benjaminpatch.com

Benjamin Patch · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
benjamincorey.net
benjamincorey
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
benjamin-lin.com
Benjamin Lin Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
benjamintan.io
Benjamin Tan Wei Hao
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
benkruger.me
Projects | Benjamin J. Kruger
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
blueginadesigns.com
Kuckuk.com login page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
codelibary.com
Code Snippets
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
kuckuk.com
Kuckuk.com login page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
invisal.com
invisal - home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
softwarepatternslexicon.com
Design Patterns & Software Architecture | Software Patterns Lexicon
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
adampreble.net
Adam Preble – Cocoa, Trains, and Pinball
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
aryanpanda.com
Aryan Panda | Student Portfolio
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
interview6.com
Interview6 - JavaScript & ES6 Interview Guide
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
robinrheem.com
Robin Rheem
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
8mincode.com
8 min code
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
code4kotlin.com
Code 4 Kotlin
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
iravid.com
Home – Itamar's Blog
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
dolezal.dev
Vojtěch Doležal - Main Page
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
gumarapus.com
Home
1 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.