Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benjaminlidofsky.com

Benjamin Lidofsky – Macroeconomist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
70match
behavioralmacro-workshop.com
Behavioral Macroeconomics Workshop
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
adamgeorge.me
Adam George | Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
divitiae.ai
DIVITIAE.AI: Macroeconomics & Markets
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
mcmahonecon.com
Michael McMahon – Macroeconomist at the University of Oxford
1 shared topicseconomy
69match
benjaminmoll.com
home - Benjamin Moll
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
kwasnica.com
Tony Kwasnica Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
intuonomy.com
Intuonomy - Interactive Macroeconomic Visualizer
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
network-macroeconomics.org
Homepage - Forum for Macroeconomics and Macroeconomic Policies
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
adrienmatray.net
Adrien Matray – Economist, Scholar & Policy Researcher
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
sofiewaltl.com
Sofie R Waltl – Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
68match
benjaminssmith.com
BENJAMIN S. SMITH - Home
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
maximotorero.com
Maximo Torero – Our Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
aboutphiliphbrown.net
Philip H Brown Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
benjaminbraun.org
Benjamin Braun
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
piaandres.com
Pia Andres – Technological Change and Environmental Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
nextgeneconomist.com
Next-Gen Economist
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
theredneckeconomist.com
rneconomist.com
1 shared topicseconomy
67match
gregorylevieuge.com
Grégory Levieuge – Economist
1 shared topicseconomy

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.