Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benjaminjohncock.com

Benjamin Johncock · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
benjaminwbass.com
Benjamin W. Bass
2 shared topicsfiction
73match
benjamincompson.com
Benjamin Compson
2 shared topicsfiction
72match
benjaminhickey.org
Benjamin Hickey
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
benjaminhorwitz.com
The Plays of Benjamin Horwitz
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
benjamincrow.com
Benjamin Crow – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
benjaminwickler.com
A Website by Benjamin W Ickler
2 shared topicsfiction
67match
benjaminkirkby.com
Benjamin Kirkby – Writer, Novelist, Artist, and Media Fan
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
advancedfictionwriting.com
Advanced Fiction Writing, By Randy Ingermanson, The "Snowflake Guy"
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
benjaminstruck.com
Benjamin J. Struck – The West Wind Tales
2 shared topicsfiction
66match
roanjohnson.com
Roan Johnson
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
benjaminkelly.net
Benjamin Kelly.net – Author blog
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
benjaminckinney.com
Benjamin C. Kinney - still pruning... »
2 shared topicsfiction
65match
benjaminjohnryan.com
Home
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
benjaminwuyts.com
Benjamin Wuyts | Welcome & Goodbye, Earth Earth Series
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
bobdelucaauthor.com
Robert John DeLuca
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
thequantumcurators.com
Home - Eva St John
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
benmarshallwriter.com
BEN MARSHALL - Ben Marshall Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
benjaminfrog.com
Benjamin T. Collier's Blog | Not stupid. But possibly contagious.
2 shared topicsfiction

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.