Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benjaminhwang.com

Benjamin Hwang · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
matthewnazarian.com
Matthew Nazarian
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
robynalley.com
Robyn Alley
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
dmaya.ai
dMaya: Vibe Design Platform for AI UI Design
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
acsahstanley.com
Acsah Stanley | Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
akshat.me
Akshat Mishra | Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
andyhamiltondesign.com
Andy Hamilton | AI-enabled Product Design | Durham, NC
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
andrewwhited.com
Andrew Whited · Staff product designer · AI, agentic systems, enterprise platforms, information architecture
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
andrewcdesign.com
Andrew Christopher — Product Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
annamira.net
Anna Mira | Design Platform Lead
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
8ntn.com
NOMANT — Custom Products Powered by AI
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
8px.ai
8px - AI Design Tool
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
beiping.org
RCAID ® - 人工智能设计研究中心
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
beingdesignerly.com
Being Designerly - The philosophy behind Undelegatable, and the human skills that sharpen when AI is everywhere.
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
bh-42.com
Bauhaus 42 - Revolutionizing AEC
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
1000designs.io
Efata – AI-Powered Design Platform for Culturally Relevant Graphics
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
1ux.net
Exploring the Frontier of User Experience Design: What's New in UX
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
3mdash.net
Ivan Korniienko
2 shared topicsdesign
60match
3laws.studio
3LAWS — Human. Ethic. Design.
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.