Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benjamin-chan.com

Benjamin Chan | Software Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
80match
alamdev.tech
Alam | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
80match
mdfarzan.com
Md Farzan | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
mbalkirkan.com
Muhammet Balkırkan | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
benjaminkakar.dev
Benjamin Kakar | Full Stack Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andrewgordon.dev
Andrew Gordon | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
armaganarslan.com
Armağan Arslan | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ruvieeto.com
Ruvie | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
krislito.com
Kris Lito | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
doanthien.com
Duc Thien Doan | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
adityak.net
Aditya Kharote | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
roykachani.com
Roy Kachani | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
abda.dev
Abdelrahman Elhag | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arghadeepdas.com
Arghadeep Das | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
boscofong.com
Bosco Fong - Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arlwinf.com
Arlwin Fajardo | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ktariayman.com
Ayman Ktari — Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
ankurraj.tech
Ankur Raj | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
arjundev.com
Arjun Debnath | Software Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.