Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bengtorstig.com

Bengt Örstig · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
booksorwheels.com
Melissa A Dingman
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
therosarey.com
Rosa Rey
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
greenvinebooks.com
Faye Green
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
ktbrison.com
KT Brison
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
alderstrange.com
Alder Strange
2 shared topicsfiction
64match
timramseybooks.com
Tim Ramsey
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
64match
bookanthology.com
Michael J Norris
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
andrewstiggers.com
Andrew Stiggers - Short Story Writer
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
armanmirhadi.com
Writer | Arman Mirhadi
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
kristenroedel.com
Kristen Roedel – Author
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
ajmason.net
AJ Mason | Author, curious child and geek
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
theunpublishedmind.com
The Unpublished Mind – Explore various unpublished works presented here for you to enjoy!
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
beverlylanderson.com
Queer Books: Romance, Fantasy, and Science Fiction Books | Beverly L. Anderson: From the Ashes, Rise.
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
ariablake.com
Author Aria Blake
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
arlosharp.com
Arlo Sharp, author - Arlo Sharp, author
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
bobbieloubooks.com
Bobbie Lou
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
63match
dobsonmedia.com
Melanie Dobson ~ Author
2 shared topicsfiction
63match
kylemills.com
Kyle Mills: #1 New York Times Bestselling Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.