Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bender.io

The Gradual Steep | Andrew Bender · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
andrewjacobson.dev
andrew jacobson
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
andrewrthomas.com
Hi, I'm Andrew
1 shared topicsdatabases
65match
angov.org
Atanas Angov – Personal Blog
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
sa-mob-technology.co.uk 🇬🇧
Home
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
domcorvasce.com
Domenico Corvasce
1 shared topicsdatabases
64match
gregshealthitblog.com
Greg's Health IT Blog
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
andrewfindlay.io
Andrew Findlay | DuckDB SQL Portfolio
1 shared topicsdatabases
63match
andrewmcdermid.net
Andrew McDermid | this is my professional blog
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
camblab.co.uk 🇬🇧
Camblab - The Camlab Blog and Information Database Camlab
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
camblab.uk 🇬🇧
Camblab - The Camlab Blog and Information Database Camlab
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
addressbookdb.com
Addressbook on Database - Addressbook
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
achfrag.net
Jan’s website and blog | Jan’s blog on big data, databases, and distributed systems
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
maxsigrist.com
Max Sigrist
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
phoneandemailappend.com
Phone and Email Append
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
bedrock-archive.com
Bedrock — The Essential Upgrade for Research and Writing
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
rocky-data.dev
Rocky: the typed graph between your code and your warehouse | Rocky
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
thelastdb.com
LastDB - The last database you will need
1 shared topicsdatabases
62match
thereadreplica.com
The Read Replica | AI, Postgres & Modern Engineering
1 shared topicsdatabases

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.