Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to benchanjamin.com

Benjamin Chan · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
ben-xu.dev
Benjamin Xu
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
75match
benjaminward.com
Benjamin Ward
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
benjaminschott.com
Benjamin Schott
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
74match
benjamin-desmet.com
Benjamin Desmet
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
73match
benjack.io
Benjamin R. Jack
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
72match
benjaminbthompson.com
Benjamin Thompson
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
72match
benblanquart.com
Benjamin Blanquart
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
benchristen.com
benjaminchristen
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
benjaminchristen.com
benjaminchristen
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
71match
benjamincarlson.io
Home – Benjamin Carlson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
benjaminstrick.com
Home - Benjamin Strick
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
benjaminryan.org
Benjamin Ryan's Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
66match
benjaminhirsch.net
Benjamin Hirsch, passionate software developer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
65match
theodore-chan.com
theodore chan
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
64match
benji377.dev
benji377 (Benjamin Demetz) - Full-Stack Developer Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
benjaminguzman.dev
Benjamín Guzmán | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
bguzman.dev
Benjamín Guzmán | Software Engineer
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
63match
arminatarod.com
Armin Atarod
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.