Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bencane.com

Benjamin Cane · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
oehmsmith.com
Brooke Benjamin Oehm Smith
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
kontrollr.com
benjaminkott (Benjamin Kott) · GitHub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
moon-canyon.com
Moon Canyon
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bcarrigan.com
Brian Carrigan
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
bcardoso.com
Brandon Cardoso
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
lwaehner.com
Luke Waehner | Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
platformprotagonist.com
Platform Protagonist
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
cameroncabo.com
Cameron Cabo
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
heidiks.com
blog.heidiks.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ocdeedtechbites.app
Ocdeed Tech Bites - The Useful Side of Tech
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
conancai.com
Conan Cai
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
caffeinecoding.com
Caffeine Coding
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
platformsignals.dev
Platform Signals
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
isdiak.com
Welcome to IsDiak | IsDiak
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kramnameloc.com
Kramnameloc | Notes on software, automation, and thoughtful engineering.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
lwaite.com
Luke Waite
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mohdali.dev
mohdali.dev - Software notes by Mohamed Ali
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
moidx.com
moidx
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.