similar sites

‹ Profile AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bellur.dev

SametBELLUR (Samet BELLUR) · GitHub · ranked by shared content topics & relevance

eBellmer (Ethan Bellmer) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Andy-Bell (Andy Bell) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

niapoor (Nia Poor) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

dombean · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

Mes-ser (Messer) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aaix (aidan) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

a-jd (AJ Dave) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Inueni · GitHub

2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

trey-k · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

faqeel (Fares) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

bigmusic (BiG) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

1LtFord · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

instanceflow.com

dimitaracev · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

aPinat (aPinat) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

romanambroselli.com

r0m4n (Roman Ambroselli) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

thexman · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

Krysov (krysov) · GitHub

2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.