similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to belcare.com

Belcare alternatives & similar sites

Ästhetische, Rekonstruktive und Handchirurgie in Aarau — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Surgery →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
belcare.ch ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Ästhetische, Rekonstruktive und Handchirurgie in Aarau	Switzerland en	surgery WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
chirurgiezentrumsolothurn.ch ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Chirurgiezentrum Solothurn	Switzerland en	surgery	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drrh.ch ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Chirurgische Praxis - Dr. med. Regula Humm	Switzerland en	surgery	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medconsult-aachen.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Deutsche Akademie für Neurochirurgie - German Academy of Neurosurgery	en	surgery	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dr-vidal.ch ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Chirurgie Thyroide Lausanne, Sion : Dr Vidal Spécialiste FMH	Switzerland en	surgery WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henkgiele.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	henk giele – plastic, reconstructive, hand and transplant surgeon	en	surgery WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
elgarhillplasticandhandclinic.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Andrew Cavallo. Plastic, Reconstructive, Hand Surgeon Melbourne. Elgar Hill Clinic	en	surgery WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
restorativeplastics.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Restorative Plastic and Reconstructive Surgeons	en	surgery WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eplasticsurgeon.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Pravin Puri board certified in both plastic and reconstructive surgery	United States~ en	surgery	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2nd-chance.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	2nd Chance Reconstructive Surgery for Life Reconstruction	en	surgery WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctbreastrecon.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	A Mt. Kisco Plastic Surgeon Specializing in Breast Reconstruction	en	surgery	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctbreastreconstruction.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	A Mt. Kisco Plastic Surgeon Specializing in Breast Reconstruction	en	surgery	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
facesthetique.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Facesthetique - Best Eye Care Hospital in Delhi	en	surgery WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
omegasurgical.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Home Page - Omega Surgical Instruments	en	surgery WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
medical-up.co.uk ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Medical Aesthetics - Medical Up	United Kingdom en	surgery WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3vcenters.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	3V Centers • Ultrasound guided surgery centers • Hand Surgery	en	surgery WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ssp-inc.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Specialty Surgical Products \| We are committed to the development and support of the plastic and reconstructive surgery specialty.	en	surgery WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
earreconstructionspecialist.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Ear Reconstruction Surgeon - Dr. Russell Griffiths	en	surgery	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.