Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to beharnage.com

B.E. Harnage – Author and Artist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
73match
andreapitzer.com
Andrea Pitzer – Author and Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
73match
dizwhite.com
Diz White – Actress and Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
72match
gaylenewilson.com
Gaylene Wilson – Author and Illustrator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
islastuart.com
Isla Stuart – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
richoettinger.com
rich oettinger – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
annabmoore.com
Anna B. Moore – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
susanjaustin.com
Susan J. Austin, PhD – Author and Educator
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
bculverjr.com
bculverjr – Author Page
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
susanmarchese.com
Susan Marchese – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
conniebertelsenyoung.com
Connie Bertelsen Young – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
sharamoon.com
Shara Moon – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
basmaakram.com
Basma Akram – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
annasequoia.com
Anna Sequoia – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
caiawinter.com
Caia Winter – Author.
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
caitjohnson.com
Cait Johnson – author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
moniamazigh.com
Monia Mazigh – Author and Human Rights Activist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
sharonchoebooks.com
sharon choe – author & academic
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
itsokaytowonder.com
Rhonda Wagner – Author
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.