Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to begallagher.com

Home | Brian Gallagher | Lighting Design · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
74match
rgb-china.com
rgb | lighting design and technical planning
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
callum-gorniak.com
CG Design
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
bcaateliers.com
Lighting Design | BCA Ateliers
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
oculuslightstudio.com
Oculus Light Studio | Award-Winning Architectural Lighting Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
odonohoeandrose.com
O'Donohoe Lighting ~ Architectural Lighting Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
odonohoelighting.com
O'Donohoe Lighting ~ Architectural Lighting Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
pointing-design.com
Home » Pointing Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
bathomasdesign.com
Home | brianthomasdesign
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
helenamageelighting.com
HELENA MAGEE | Lighting - Home
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
camdenpetersondesigns.com
Camden Peterson - Lighting Design
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
co-techlighting.co.uk 🇬🇧
Lighting Design - Maidstone, Kent | Co-Tech Lighting
1 shared topicsdesign
70match
camassardesigns.com
Gabrielle Camassar Lighting Design
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
beccabriones.com
Home | Becca Briones Graphic Design
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
kobistudio.com
Home - kobi lighting studio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
beckettundatil.com
Becket Tundatil – Best Lighting Designer in India & Asia
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
beegeedesign.com
BeeGee Design | Brian Gee Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
oceanadvae.com
HOME | OCEAN DESIGN
1 shared topicsdesign
69match
gcreativiti.com
Home | GCREATIVITI - Delivering Design
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.