Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to becomingdesign.com

Becoming Design | Jeff Jackson | UX/UI Designer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
77match
dmuxui.com
DANIEL MUSA | UX/UI DESIGNER
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
hendanwar.com
Hend Mohamed | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
shathaaldhayan.com
Shatha Aldhayan | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
andyszetho.com
Andy Szetho | UX/UI DESIGNER
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
andreeabacanu.com
Andreea Bacanu | UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
gaylebartondesign.com
Gayle Barton Design | UX/UI Design
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
mohsent.com
Mohsen Taghizadeh | Senior Product Designer | Experienced UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
andersonrodriguesr.com
Anderson Rodrigues — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
moldhead.com
Ramona Lehmann | UX/UI Designer (Constance, Germany)
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
annanguyenux.com
Anna Nguyen | UX / UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
escobaruxui.com
Carolina Escobar | UX/UI Designer, Product Designer, Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
herczhajni.com
Brandventure Design | UX/UI Design • Brand & Web Design
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
shirwizeman.com
Shir Wizeman | Experienced UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
esmeefulcher.com
Esmee Fulcher — UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
heshamabozaid.com
Hesham Abozaid| UX/UI Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
annawszelaka.com
Anna Wszelaka | Product UX/UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
monsieurjip.com
Monsieur Jip - UX UI Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
70match
angelarjackson.com
Angela Jackson | Product, UX, Service Design | UK
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.