Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to beccadeitch.com

UX Designer & Accessibility Advocate Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
fatemeux.com
Fateme | UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
robwynia.com
Todd Lee | Senior UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
sofiekim.com
SOFIEKIM - Digital Accessibility, Inclusive Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
kristiechau.com
Kristie Chau | UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
krmaazha.com
KRMAAZHA | UX/UI & Product Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
maximeadrichem.com
Maxime Adrichem | UX Designer portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
74match
mazenzoor.com
Mazen Zoor | Senior UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
mateocohenuxid.com
Mateo’s Portfolio | UI/UX Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
kylelundy.com
UX Portfolio | Product Designer & Strategist
2 shared topicsdesign
73match
arthurdebiase.com
Arthur De Biase - UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
theresaabegunde.com
TheresaAbegunde - UX/UI Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
fatimakhan-ux-ui.com
UX Design Portfolio | Fatima Khan
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
robincullen.com
Robin Cullen Design Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
ngshipeng.com
Home | Ng Shi Peng's UI/UX Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
fatmanur-files.com
Fatmanur | Design portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
ku2design.com
Pradeep Prakash | Product Designer Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
72match
ashleysanford.com
UX Design Portfolio - Home
2 shared topicsdesign
71match
fatimauxdesign.com
UX Designer Experience Portfolio | Fatima Badr
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.