Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to beataritter.com

Vincent Ritter · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
eugwritten.com
EugWritten
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
contentoak.com
Home - Content Oak
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
mohanmekap.com
ITTECH
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
investigatingsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
Investigating Software
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
itswincer.com
Wincer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
cahall-labs.com
cahall-labs.com - Ted Cahall - Home Data Center and Software Labs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
m9concepts.com
M9 Concepts
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gatheringagility.com
Gathering Agility
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
dikranmeliksetian.com
Home – Dikran Meliksetian, Ph.D.
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
esqueezit.com
assumption of advancement – Blog about software architecture
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
esqueezite.com
assumption of advancement – Blog about software architecture
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ivettordog.com
Ivett Ördög
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
plotjs.com
Shane Reustle
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
heyjuno.app
Juno | Transient Labs
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
kreitmayer.com
Stefan Kreitmayer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ricegeo.com
Geodata Ramblings
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
ricegeo.dev
Geodata Ramblings
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
andrewluka.com
Andrew Luka
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.