Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bdurham.dev

/home | bdurham.dev · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
bugshell.com
Home | bugshell
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
69match
redaa.dev
Home | redaa.dev
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
68match
bugculture.io
Home | Bug Culture
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
elijahx.dev
Home | Elijah
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
67match
byrud-dynamics.com
Home | Byrud-Dynamics
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
acfirth.com
Home | acfirth
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
67match
honeypotbot.com
Home | Honeypot
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
67match
ahab.dev
Home | HackinAhab
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
66match
cosmodiumcs.com
Home | CosmodiumCS
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
66match
reconhygiene.com
Home | ReconHygiene
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
66match
8bitsecurity.com
Home | 8Bit Security
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
66match
juljankrause.com
Home | Juljan Krause
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
crankysec.com
CrankySec
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
66match
mrtechforge.com
Home | M.R. TechForge
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
66match
gabrielteotonio.com
Home | Gabriel Teotonio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
atilho.com
Home | Steven Morais Atilho
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
65match
eli2k.com
Home | My Cybersecurity Notes
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
65match
lucas-sousa.com
Home | Tech Notebook by Lucas
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.