Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bcordes.com

Wm. B. (Bill) Cordes website - Home · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
suzzgenpage.com
Home | A website about genealogy
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
payea.co.uk 🇬🇧
Payea Family Website
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
shaw-creek.com
Website of Shaw-Creek
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
nwigs.com
NWIGS - HOME
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
caggni.com
CAGGNI - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
dirlonline.com
DIRL Online - Home Page
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
plishker.com
Plishker Family Website
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
coomans.com
A Coomans family website
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
65match
shippee.com
ALL THINGS SHIPPEE - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
campbellaustralia.com
The Web Site of the Campbell Family in Australia - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
kovener.com
Kovener Family Website – Kovener Family
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
ribchester.com
Ribchester.Com - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
batescom.com
THE BATES FAMILY - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
essigalyalutalo.com
Essiga lya Lutalo - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
shierfamily.com
Our Shier Family - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
swedishgenealogy.com
Swedish Genealogy - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
calabriagenealogy.com
Calabria Genealogy - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry
64match
campaniagenealogy.com
Campania Genealogy - Home
1 shared topicsgenealogy-and-ancestry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.