Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to battal.com

Battal Group · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
bcomglobalgroup.com
BCom Global Group
2 shared topicslogistics
73match
4plgroup.com
4PL Group
2 shared topicslogistics
73match
gensolvaglobalgroup.com
GENSOLVA Global Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
72match
abc-igroup.com
ABC INTERNATIONAL Group
2 shared topicslogistics
71match
lynkinternational.com
LYNK INTERNATIONAL GROUP
2 shared topicslogistics
71match
comexasgroup.com
CONNEX GROUP
2 shared topicslogistics
71match
connex.com
CONNEX GROUP
2 shared topicslogistics
70match
superglobalgroup.com
Super Global Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
70match
dmclog.com
DMC GROUP
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
70match
mab-group.com
Mab Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
70match
mabgroup.com
Mab Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
70match
ribaldiglobalgroup.com
Ribaldi Global Group
2 shared topicslogistics
70match
islgroups.com
ISL Groups Logistic Company
2 shared topicslogistics
70match
oceaninternationaleg.com
Home - OCEAN INTERNATIONAL GROUP
2 shared topicslogistics
70match
cargopartners.co.uk 🇬🇧
Woodland Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
70match
freightrate.co.uk 🇬🇧
Woodland Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
69match
container-central.com
The Fargo Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry
69match
containerhaulage.com
The Fargo Group
2 shared topicslogistics-and-transportation-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.