Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to baterka.dev

baterka.xyz · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
eterkit.com
Eterkit
1 shared topicsweb-development
63match
anguspaterson.com
Angus Paterson
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
mollerandromeo.com
Moller and Romeo
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
anlerkan.dev
Anılerkan Madenci
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
shawnkok.com
Shawn Kok. | Kokje
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
swiftwaterdev.com
Swiftwater Dev LLC
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
hellomaks.com
Home | Maxim Cherkasov
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
8stel.com
MaterialPro +React + js
1 shared topicsweb-development
62match
richardrobu.com
Richard Robu - Portfolio
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
bates-solutions.com
Mike Bates | Full Stack Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
dixdigital.net
DIX Digital | Your Digital Partner
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
richardcodes.com
Richard Rodriguez | Software Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
garciacalcaterra.com
Gonzalo García Calcaterra — Backend Engineer
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
ishworkhatri.com
Web & Software Developer from Louisville, Kentucky!
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
planetharold.com
Harold Rodriguez - Web App Developer - PlanetHarold
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
points2crypto.com
gennius.xyz - Building Human-to-Human technologies
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
pointstocrypto.com
gennius.xyz - Building Human-to-Human technologies
1 shared topicsweb-development
61match
rewardstokenizationservices.com
gennius.xyz - Building Human-to-Human technologies
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.