Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bater.io

Kirk Bater · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
66match
esherido.com
Dirk Gadsden, at dirk.to
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
rileighbates.com
Rileigh Bates
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andrewhxue.com
Andrew Xue
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andreasellwanger.com
Andreas Ellwanger
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
cameronlai.com
Cameron Lai - Cameron Lai
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
connyay.com
Connor Hindley
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
divisionfieldguide.com
Christopher Mancini | Problem Solver Who Writes Code
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
esosaohangbon.com
Esosa Ohangbon
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
evanm.dev
Evan McIntire
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
gbramwell.com
gregbramwell.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
henriwoodcock.com
Henri Woodcock
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
heysaurabh.com
Saurabh Kumar - Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
itskoba.dev
Home | Koba
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
anthonyarellano.com
Anthony Arellano
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
bazarkua.com
Adilbek Bazarkulov
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
its-the-seeker.com
Mayur Shingrakhiya - Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
richieri.io
Fabricio Richieri
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
shenghangao.com
Stefan Gao | Software Engineer
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.