similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to bataylor.net

Bataylor alternatives & similar sites

Noticings, Wonderings, & Yearnings… | …of words and the Word — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Christianity →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
dickbraswell.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	dickbraswell \| Encouraging Words from the WORD	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samholm.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	samholm.com \| Learning to live the Word of God	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pneumaandlogos.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Pneuma and Logos \| A Theology of Word and Spirit	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devotionalnews.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Devotional News \| our time in the word…	en	christianity WordPress Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
plainsprof.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Musings from WinDSwept Junction – This, that, and the other.	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
disciplingmen.org ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Men of the Word – Training Men to know and love God's Word	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pleasantwordsheal.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Pleasant Words Heal \| Pleasant and healing are the words coming from prudent guidance, which we receive from God.	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sweetlutheran.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	finding Grace in Surprising Ways – Questions and ponderings	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derekmichaellarson.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Thoughts on Faith – The Work and Ministry of Derek Michael Larson	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukebeecham.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Chanting Down Babylon - ...and wondering where the lions are...	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelcronin.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	A Brave New Heaven – words to illuminate and inspire	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ndcoming.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Writing in Red — The Words of Jesus \| 2ndComing.net	en	christianity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1stbaptistwow.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Women of the Word	en	christianity Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1stbaptistwomenoftheword.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Women of the Word	en	christianity Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
avalonbeachchurch.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Avalon Beach Church – Waves and Worship on the 30th Street Beach	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lucasleibforth.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Lucas Leibforth – a conversation on theology and the mundane.	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
averieaubuchon.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Deep Calls to Deep – Lingering long in Scripture, wandering far in the world, and living from the overflow.	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digginintheword.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Diggin' in the Word – What Does God's Word Say?	en	christianity WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.