Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to basvanderploeg.com

Bas van der Ploeg · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
activemodels.ai
Active Models
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
71match
growingneverstops.com
Growing Never Stops
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
armanvl.com
Arman van Lieshout
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
thepowerplatformnerd.com
The Power Platform Nerd
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
alexanderschroll.com
Alexander Schroll
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
netwit.io
NetWit Wire
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
inteidea.com
Latest AI News - Intelligent Ideas - Inteidea - AI Technology and Intelligent Ideas
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
softcoy.com
SOFTCOY | WordPress AI Content Plugin And Form Builder Plugins
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
thepowerpilot.com
Power Pilot
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
artashesvar.com
Artashes Vardanyan
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
gsantoro.dev
Giuseppe Santoro's blog
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
63match
themaestroindia.com
Front Page - The Maestro India
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
bigyandhakal.com
Bigyan Dhakal
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
pmrowla.com
pmrowla
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
rodel.dev
Portfolio | Rodel van Rooijen
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
robindeneef.com
Robin De Neef
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
fastkava.com
Tokener Pro
2 shared topicsartificial-intelligence
62match
instructionmanuel.com
Instruction Manuel
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.