Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to baruga.id

Homepage - Baruga.id · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
dirdp.com
Homepage
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
surfacescholar.com
Homepage
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
71match
maastastic.com
Homepage - Fandomtastic
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
mohamedghazi.com
Homepage - Mohamed Ghazi
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
susannadathur.com
Homepage - Susan Nadathur
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
0xgrid.com
My Homepage
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
kniga-book.com
Homepage - Книга-Book
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
70match
andoverbookstore.com
Homepage - Andover Bookstore
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
69match
bcyukonbookprizes.com
Homepage - BC and Yukon Book Prizes
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
computequestcreators.com
Homepage - Computequestcreators.com
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
a-bootles.com
bootles' homepage
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
angielucas.com
Angie Lucas Homepage
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
3dhamster-tech.com
Home Page - 3dlibrary
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
annamediaproductions.com
Book Store Homepage - annamediaproductions
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kookamoot.com
Home page - Kookamoot
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
platform5.com
Home Page - Platform 5
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
beautifulsong.com
Home - Beautiful Song
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
65match
annesebba.com
HomePage - Anne SebbaAnne Sebba | Writer Lecturer Journalist
1 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.