Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to barrickapps.com

Barrick Apps LLC · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
reecaly.com
Reecaly - Mobile & Apps News
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
k1apps.dev
K1 Apps
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
5thmetric.com
Power Apps
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
ahlert.app
Ahlert Apps
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
simonzheng.com
Simon Zheng
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
echoemoji.com
EchoEmoji - Feedback App
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
buildandlead.com
Build And Lead | How to design apps and manage software teams
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
refactorworks.com
RefactorWorks LLC
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
frogtech.dev
Frogtech.dev - Creating modern media apps
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
craziplay.com
Discover Better Apps - craziplay.com
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
bugsappleloves.com
Bugs Apple Loves
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
simonengelbert.com
Simon Engelbert
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
abigailemployee.ai
v0 App
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
gabrielajram.com
v0 App
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
justinle.dev
v0 App
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
asterkit.com
AsterKit / MszPro — Make apps for a better world
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
builderswave.com
Discover Great Apps from Community Builders | Builderswave
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
fujianmian.com
Heng Jun Yong
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.