Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to bantstar.com

반티스타 · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
41match
geumsusa.com
AMC_DESIGN
2 co-citations6 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
39match
hangulssi.com
한글씨 | 글자를 그리는
3 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
35match
2nul.com
이널
3 co-citations0 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
32match
hetitworld.com
[Hetit : 헤티]
2 co-citations6 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
32match
binsholic.com
빈스홀릭
2 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
31match
joelleflower.com
Joelle flower design studio
2 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
30match
hdcont.com
현대컨테이너 한림
2 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
30match
grid-dot.com
그리드
3 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
28match
7panbaksa.com
칠판박사-칠판,화이트보드 전문가
3 co-citations2 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
28match
cbtanz.com
세종 춤벗 무용학원
3 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorydance
28match
elephantslaugh.com
Elephants Laugh
2 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
28match
hjculture.com
에이치제이컬쳐
3 co-citations4 shared tech0 shared categorytheater
28match
bookillust.com
BIRTH OF ILLUSTBOOK
3 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
27match
jasmong.com
자스몽 - 자석제작전문
2 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
27match
bondesign-studio.com
본디자인 스튜디오 | bondesign studio
2 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
27match
jiarchi.com
제이아이 건축사사무소
2 co-citations1 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
27match
hidalab.com
hida - Color Material Finish specialists (히다랩)
3 co-citations5 shared tech0 shared categorydesign
26match
jicsofficial.com
JICS
2 co-citations3 shared tech0 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.