Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to baladac.com

Welcome to Baladac · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
40match
grioss.com
C.I.A.K. | Preduzeće za trgovinu i reciklažu
2 co-citations2 shared techgreen-solutions
35match
2iandbinstalacije.com
2I & B instalacije d.o.o.
2 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
32match
betonboja.com
Beton Boja | Izdržljive industrijske boje za beton, bazene i metal
2 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
30match
crewova.com
Crewova - Construction Management Platform
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
30match
beton-bohr.com
Beton Bohr – Bušenje i rezanje betona
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
28match
gruppo-effe.com
Gruppo Effe
1 shared tech1 shared categorymechanical-and-industrial-engineering-industry
27match
legalizacijagradnje.com
Novosti vezane za legalizaciju, projektiranje i građenje
1 co-citations1 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
26match
jadrankamen.com
Jadrankamen – eksploatacija, prerada, prodaja i ugradnju arhitektonsko-građevnog kamena.
2 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
23match
gromatic-navigo.com
Gromatic NaviGO d.o.o.
1 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
22match
betulaprojekt.com
Betula Projekt – Građevina, istraživanje i razvoj
1 shared tech1 shared categoryconstruction-industry
20match
gsamuhendislik.com
GSA Mühendislik
1 shared categorycivil-engineering-industry
20match
fap-prom.com
FAP PROM - PVC & ALU Stolarija, Staklene i Ventilisane Fasade
1 shared categoryconstruction-industry

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.