Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to bakeacap.com

Kim · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
85match
julianhaddad.com
Julian Haddad Design
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
lara-al-hadeedi.com
Lara Al-Hadeedi, Art Director
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
jjjunceda.com
jjjunceda
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
adriannak.com
Adrianna Kusmierczyk
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfine-art
85match
cemaltinoz.com
Cemal Works
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydigital-arts
85match
ferranmayoral.com
Ferran Mayoral
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
85match
georginahenry.com
Georgina Henry
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
82match
jiapingchendesign.com
UP
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
kenzhenry.com
Mackenzie Henry
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
bairballiet.com
bairballiet
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
celcea.com
celcea
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
75match
coralgarvey.com
CoralGarveyWork2024
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
juliagerritsen.com
juliagerritsen
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
jiaqivisual.com
JIAQI
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
heyallyson.com
Allyson Griffiths
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
cehndesign.com
cehndesign
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
dididiwu.com
di.d.wu
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
73match
fernandanunez.com
flotsamstudio
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.