Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to bairdlb.dev

Baird Buckingham | Creative Technologist · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
69match
nicheneeds.com
NicheNeeds - Amsterdam AI Creative Lab
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
nicolas-neubert.com
Nicolas Neubert - AI Creative Direction & Product Design
2 shared topicsdesign
67match
pixelnutscreative.com
Pixel Nuts Creative
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
rossamania.com
Ross Salanoa — Product Designer & Creator
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
neueschool.com
Neue School — Premium Creative, At AI Speed.
2 shared topicsdesign
66match
pixorah.com
Pixorah Design | AI-Assisted Creative Studio
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
gruberdesignstudio.com
Gruber Design Studio - AI Collaborative Digital Media Design
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
doers-studio.com
DOERS — Design · Orchestrate · Execute · Reach · Ship
2 shared topicsdesign
64match
fermoraga.com
fer moraga — brand strategy & ai generative | Fer Moraga
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
agenticdesigner.ai
Agentic Designer | Mike Lang
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
mattdowney.com
Matt Downey — AI Product Design, Digital Native Newsletter
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
solimanshaban.com
Soliman Shaban | Principal Product Designer in Dubai
2 shared topicsdesign
63match
5amstudio.com
Arqos® Studio - AI-driven design agency
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
roniobaid.com
Roni Obaid
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
acsahstanley.com
Acsah Stanley | Portfolio
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
arteplaneur.com
Grow, Adapt & Thrive As A Designer
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
neyohaus.com
Neyo Digital Haus
2 shared topicsdesign
62match
neurodesign-studio.com
NEURODESIGN
2 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.