Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to baileymeadow.com

bailey meadow · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
71match
juliagerritsen.com
juliagerritsen
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
68match
haneffinger.com
portfolio | han effinger
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
65match
guidomitidieri.com
gumi
3 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
64match
kjaehwn.com
kjaehwn
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
64match
adriannak.com
Adrianna Kusmierczyk
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categoryfine-art
64match
cemaltinoz.com
Cemal Works
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydigital-arts
64match
georginahenry.com
Georgina Henry
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
62match
dididiwu.com
di.d.wu
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
62match
fernandanunez.com
flotsamstudio
2 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
61match
jiaqivisual.com
JIAQI
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
61match
heyallyson.com
Allyson Griffiths
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
61match
fibikung.com
FIBI KUNG
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
jackieanzaldi.com
Jackie Anzaldi Creative Director
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
58match
elenapejovska.com
elena pejovska
3 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorydesign
57match
juliannabach.com
Studio J.B.
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
57match
manuelabarretot.com
manuelabarretot
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
57match
jaclynarellano.com
jaclyn arellano
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign
57match
janineworld.com
Janine World
1 co-citations2 shared tech2 shared categorydesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.