Piperic Business Intelligence
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to badzelda.com

badzelda.com | home · ranked by category · tech stack · backlink co-citation
54match
eliankwells.com
Elian K. Wells | Home
2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
52match
kbarn.com
kbarn
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
52match
bibliothecamundi.com
BibliothecaMundi book club & society
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
52match
michellesalter.com
Michelle Salter Author Home
2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
52match
douglasreidskinner.com
Douglas Reid Skinner: Home
2 shared tech1 shared categorypoetry
51match
mhlibrary.com
Home - Marquette Heights Public Library
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
51match
dolorism.com
dolorism .com
2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
51match
donatofarms.com
Helena Lourdes Donato-Sapp - Award-winning Teen Educator, Disability Justice Activist, Scholar, Writer, Keynote Speaker, Aspiring Filmmaker, and Youth Poet Laur
2 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
51match
bibliophilebooks.com
Bibliophile Books - Bargain Book Store
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
51match
mydreamsandmebook.com
My Dreams and Me Book
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature
51match
fasynovel.com
Fasynovel-Fancy novels at your fingertips. | Read Novels Online
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categoryfiction
51match
angelachawkins.com
Angela C. Hawkins—Children's Author & Illustrator
1 co-citations2 shared tech1 shared categorybooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.