similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to b2-performance.at

B2 Performance alternatives & similar sites

Zander Digital Services | Digital Marketing & Technology — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Marketing And Advertising →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
b2performance.com ↗	100 match 1 shared topics	Zander Digital Services \| Digital Marketing & Technology	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mb-digitale-services.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Digitale Services \| Experten für digitales Marketing	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eviom.at ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	International Digital Marketing \| eviom	AT de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lukenda-digital.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Beratung - Digital Marketing	DE de	marketing-and-advertising Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sarahzelzer.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Sarah Zelzer, BSc - Digital Marketing & Project Partner	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
adrianoperri.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Adriano Perri \| Digital Marketing	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahypestudio.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Deine Agentur für Digital Marketing	de	marketing-and-advertising Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
l17-digital.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	L17.Digital Marketing & Consulting aus dem Sauerland	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
l17digital.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	L17.Digital Marketing & Consulting aus dem Sauerland	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lars-manke.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Agentur für digitales Marketing – Digitalagentur Lars Manke	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
felgnerdigital.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Felgner Digital Consulting – ICT, Design & Marketing	CH~ de	marketing-and-advertising	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
internet4b.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	\| Digital Marketing Agentur \| Hamburg	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kamikaze-digital.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Die Agentur \| Kamikaze Digital Marketing	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
up2summit.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	UP2SUMMIT \| Digitalisierung & Marketing \| home	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mediseo.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	mediseo – Digital Health Marketing	DE de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digital-analytics.expert ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Digital Analytics & Marketing - digital-analytics.expert	de	marketing-and-advertising WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digital-branding.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Digital Branding - Markenführung online - Digital Branding	de	marketing-and-advertising Contao	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marketing-it-services.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Marketing IT Services	DE de	marketing-and-advertising	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.