Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to b0om.net

Matt Lindeboom · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
75match
andrewdurnford.com
Andrew Durnford
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
killianm.dev
Killian Meersman
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
nathanliow.dev
Nathan Liow
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
75match
renaism.com
Hello! | Rezza Nafi
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
a13n.com
Andrew Rasmussen
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
dennisaitken.com
Dennis Aitken - Home
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
increase.co.uk 🇬🇧
Increase Computers Home | Increase Computers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
alephbbs.com
The Wirehead Mechanist | creatives and technology
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
andreaslindeborg.com
Andreas Lindeborg
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
mansiverma.com
Mansi Verma
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
sisu-x.com
SISUX NEXT - Google Analytics done for you
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
amosedoardoaccossato.com
Amos Edoardo Accossato Resume - BlueNeptuno
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ashleynelson.dev
Ashley Nelson
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
evertonportfolio.com
Online Professional Portfolio
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
chigstuff.com
Chiggins Stuff
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
aristotlelms.com
Home | Aristotle LMS
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
sinhatv.com
sinhatv
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
animeneko.net
AnimeNeko Network
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.