Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to azpekt.dev

Eryk Janiczek · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
64match
ignatowski.dev
Eryk Ignatowski
2 shared topicsweb-development
63match
iljapanic.com
Ilja Panic
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
patrickjamesdev.com
Patrick James
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
simonfullstack.com
SimonFullstack
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
skiweekendevents.com
Matrix10 | WebDev
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
pbbsystemslimited.com
PBB Systems Limited
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
resonant.dev
Resonant Development
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
testbirdhk.com
TESTBIRD HK LIMITED
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
alams.tech
Portfolio - Alam (MNA)
2 shared topicsweb-development
62match
malikjamalportfolio.com
Portfolio - Malik Jamal
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
devgrid.dev
LuxQuant | Fullstack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
ilesou.com
Lesou Technology Co., Limited
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
makmark.com
MAKmark | Fullstack Consulting
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
theaccubin.com
D'Accubin Technology Limited
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
andychang.dev
Andy Chang - Fullstack Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
adamnmth.com
Adam Nemeth - Fullstack Developer
2 shared topicsweb-development
61match
etherdream.com
EtherDream (EtherDream) · GitHub
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
61match
kingcodes.dev
Taryn King - Fullstack Engineer
2 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.