Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to azimuth.software

Azimuth · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
piceno.dev
Piceno
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
71match
softwarebypaul.com
Software by Paul
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
softwaresorcery.co.uk 🇬🇧
Software Sorcery Home
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
blueappstechnology.com
Blueapps Technology – Software development & deployment
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
maxgirkins.com
Max Girkins
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
kylemuth.com
Kyle Muth
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
rockbridgesoftware.com
Rockbridge Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
dolosplus.com
SOFTWARE DESIGN by DOLOS+
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
arquidev.com
Arquidev
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
arquidev.io
Arquidev
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
distantbluesoftware.com
Home | distant blue software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
68match
pjkumlue.com
PJ KUMLUE
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
dodukh.com
D&D Tech
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
alexpagnotta.dev
Alex Pagnotta
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
matejaksa.com
Máté Jaksa - Software Developer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
a0systems.com
A0 Systems | Faster Software Development Velocity
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
67match
sonofnos.com
Chris Emeka
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
soofgolan.com
Soof Golan | Software Consultant
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.