Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to azeemhamid.com

azeemhamid.com – Azeem Hamid, design research portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
76match
pointcreativellc.com
Point Creative LLC – Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
76match
ku-designs.com
KUDP – Kaori Ueda Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
75match
madelynnemercado.com
Madelynne Mercado – Graphic Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
74match
researchimaginings.com
Research Imagining | Travels in Design Research
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
anjaneidhardtmokoena.com
Anja Neidhardt-Mokoena – Design researcher and educator (PhD)
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
cameronrdesign.com
Cameron R Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
73match
geetikayeshwantrao.com
Geetika Yeshwantrao - design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andreeamicu.com
Andreea Micu – Architecture Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
hidalgoeduardo.com
Eduardo Hidalgo - Architecture and Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
polliemay.com
Pollie-May – My Portfolio!
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
kunaalkrishnan.com
Design portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
plemel.com
Randy Plemel – Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
kristinromero.com
Kristin Romero Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
72match
andyzhuo.dev
Andy Zhuo | Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
becadek.com
Becadek Designs – Rebecca Koo's Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
hey-oko.com
Hey-Oko | Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
mojodesignwork.com
MoJo Designwork – Michael John's Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign
71match
calebkissiah.com
Caleb Kissiah Design Portfolio
1 shared topicsdesign

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.