Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to ayushmaankothari2006.dev

Ayushmaan Kothari | Portfolio | CSE Student · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
justindaludado.com
Justin Daludado | Computer Science Student Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
70match
lorrainesanares.com
Lorraine Sanares - Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
juancwu.dev
Juan Wu | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
3bbas.dev
Ahmed Abbas - Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
loosiongyu.com
SIONG YU | PORTFOLIO
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
69match
justdentondevelops.com
JD Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
aaryaman.me
Aaryaman | Portfolio OS
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
jstnyoo.com
Justin Yoo Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
augustineteo.com
Augustine's Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
hitaesh.com
Hitaesh's Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
ozan-tutkun.com
Ozan Tutkun Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
68match
tevfiktumer.com
About | Personal Portfolio Website
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
austindelic.com
Austin Delic | Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
sinavahidi.dev
Sina | Personal Portfolio
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
andrewsperry.com
Portfolio | Andrew Sperry
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
efrane.com
eFrane.com: Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
andycorrales.dev
Andres Corrales — Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages
67match
atishaynar.com
Atishay Narayanan — Portfolio
2 shared topicsprogramming-languages

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.