Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to axw.dev

Andrew Walker - Web Developer · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
79match
andrewwebb.dev
Andrew Webb Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
79match
andrewsin.net
Andrew Sin | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
andrewcadiz.com
Andrew Cadiz Jr | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
ethanwritescode.com
Ethan James - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
renzcalangi.com
Renz Calangi - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
78match
kimrune.dev
Kim Møller - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
aniekanessiet.dev
Aniekan Essiet - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
betimsadiku.com
Betim Sadiku — Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
simonhrdy.com
Šimon Hrdý - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewberger.net
Andrew Berger | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
andrewsamuelsen.com
Andrew Samuelsen / Web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
devkod.app
Ismet Glumčević - Full-Stack Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
77match
nafea.dev
Mohamed Nafea - Full stack web developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
ankushj.dev
Ankush Joshi | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
estelzhao.com
Ting | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
deniscatalin.com
Denis Catalin | Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
abdulquyoom.tech
Abdul Quyoom - Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development
76match
paulhuisman.com
Paul Huisman | Senior Web Developer
1 shared topicsweb-development

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.