Piperic
similar sites
‹ profile

Sites similar to awkaren.com

Books and Poetry | a. w. karen · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
68match
aiyasakr.com
Aiya Sakr - Poetry | Aiya Sakr Poet
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
autumnmosspoetry.com
Autumn Moss Poetry and Prose
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
karencarterpoetry.com
KAREN CARTER POETRY - Home
2 shared topicspoetry
68match
karendouglassauthor.com
Karen Douglass, Author – Prose and Poetry
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
shilamarie.com
Shila Marie - Personalized Poetry and Books | Shila Marie
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
68match
mrobins71.com
mrobins71 – Stories and poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
karenskolfield.com
Karen Skolfield | Poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
katrinamoinet.com
KMoinetwrites – Fiction and Poetry
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
kentneal.com
Kent Neal - gay poetry books
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
awakenlovethebook.com
Awaken Love the Book | Poetry and Art book
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
karendonovanpoetry.com
karen donovan | poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
esjpoetry.com
esj poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
67match
rr-peace.com
R.R. Peace, Author and Poet
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
67match
evelinetravelli.com
E. Travelli – Short stories and poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
eventhenpoetry.com
Even Then Poetry
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature
66match
rmlapietra.com
So What If Maybe | By Rose LaPietra | Poetry Books
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
sonjaringo.com
Sonja Ringo Poetry
2 shared topicspoetry
66match
nicolerivera.com
Inspiring Books for Kids, Prayer Books, and Poetry Books | Nicole Rivera | Nicole Rivera Author
2 shared topicsbooks-and-literature

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.