Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to awesomeindex.dev

AwesomeIndex · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
awesomelab.org
Awesome Lab
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
awesome-doge.org
awesome-doge
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
71match
awesomeshadcn.dev
awesome-shadcn-ui
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
godotawesome.com
Home | GodotAwesome
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
awesomedata.stream
Awesome Streams
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
awesome-micropython.com
Awesome MicroPython
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
awesome-arabic-speakers.dev
Awesome Arabic Speakers
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
makevscodeawesome.com
Make VS Code Awesome
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
68match
repopulse.dev
RepoPulse
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
67match
terravego.com
Toolindex
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
ilayk.com
it's like awesome you know
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
awesomecloudnatives.cloud
Home | Awesome CloudNatives
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
aimeemikaelac.org
Aimee Coughlin's Awesome Site
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
66match
andreafeletto.com
Andrea Feletto
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
awesomecast.net
AwesomeCast: Tech and Gadget Talk
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
nadavid.com
Nadavid Hub
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
9lx.app
9lx — Infrastructure & Projects
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
65match
namishh.com
index | namishh
1 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.