Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfileAI ReportTools

Sites similar to awcode.org

Factory software — AWcode · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
71match
3bldrs.com
3BLDRS — Software people share
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
devculi.com
Devculi — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
imikailoby.com
Mikhail Prosmitskiy — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
paulhundal.com
Paul Hundal — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
skeelsoftware.com
Skeel Software LLC
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
1dersoftware.com
1DER Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
rghsoftware.com
RGH Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
manojkumark.com
Manojkumar K — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
70match
narity.com
Narity — Software Consulting
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
paulgasbarra.com
Paul Gasbarra — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
70match
simplysoftwaredelivery.com
Simply Software Delivery
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
24usoftware.com
24U Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
hidefsoftware.co.uk 🇬🇧
HiDef Software Ltd
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
3-03software.com
3-03 Software
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
renekirk.com
René Kirk — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
deoxy.dev
Ishan | DEOXY — Software Engineer
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
69match
ethanlow.dev
Ethan Low — Software Engineer
2 shared topicssoftware-and-applications
69match
nalbyte.com
Nalbyte Software
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.