Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to avram.dev

Razvan Avram · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
67match
krauss-it.com
Christoph K.
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ocelotsecurity.com
Ocelot Security | Hacking Writeups and blog
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
sharepoint-doc.com
JP Carpenter
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
64match
ivandankov.com
Ivan Dankov
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
63match
etodd.io
Evan Todd
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
mohamedguizani.com
Med Guizani | Senior Technical in Electronics
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
63match
0xdiyor.com
0xDiyor
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
63match
kosec.io
Home | KOSEC
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
andersoncyber.dev
Ethan Anderson
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
itsfarid.com
Hello, I'm Farid
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
shongur.com
Shon Gur — Security Researcher
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
supunadithya.com
Supun Adithya | Cybersecurity Engineering Student
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
moffcorplabs.com
Home | Moffcorp Labs
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
caffeinatedwonders.com
Caffeinated Wonders
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
hexific.com
Smart Contract Audit | HEXIFIC
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
hiumee.com
Hiumee's Random Posts
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing
62match
richtechguy.com
Rich Tech Guy - Technical blog and videos from a CCIE
2 shared topicsinformation-and-network-security
62match
dixitaditya.com
This is me
2 shared topicstechnology-and-computing

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.