similar sites

Browse

AI Report Tools

Sites similar to avparnell.com

Avparnell alternatives & similar sites

Annie Parnell – Writer, Journalist, Producer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Freelance Writing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
nanbyrne.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Nan Byrne – Writer, Story Producer	en	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
drewtewksbury.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Drew Tewksbury. Writer, Editor, Producer.	en	content-production Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystal-chan.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Crystal Chan is a writer, editor & producer.	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
g75media.co.uk ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Copywriting, Content Production and Journalism from G75 Media	GB en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
joezagorskiinc.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Joe Zagorski, Inc., Copywriter, Content Producer, Tulsa, Oklahoma	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mediabc.co.uk ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Media BC - Barry Collins - Editor, Journalist, Broadcaster	GB en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
utibe-mbagwu.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Utibe Mbagwu - Utibe Mbagwu \| Content Stategist, Producer, Writer	en	content-production	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolinedesalis.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Caroline DeSalis Creative – Creative producer and author	en	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
farflungfoodie.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Cynthia Barnes – Journalist, editor and content marketer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joetaylorjr.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Joe Taylor Jr. – Philadelphia User Experience Consultant, Author, and Media Producer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
caseymoeckel.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Casey Moeckel – Writer and Content Strategist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
uploadinsider.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Upload Insider – Write, Share, Succeed	en	freelance-writing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joupcraft.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Jo Upcraft – Content creator \| Editor \| Writer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nataliezunker.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Natalie Zunker — Strategist, Writer, Editor	en	freelance-writing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnsadlouskos.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	John Sadlouskos – Content Developer and Technical Writer	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
joegallocreative.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Joe Gallo Creative – Senior Copywriter \| Associate Creative Director \| Producer	en	content-production WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samrose101.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Sam Rose Writes \| Life is the story. Tell it.	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carolineforan.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	caroline \| foran – Editor and Branded Content Specialist	en	freelance-writing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.