Piperic
similar sites
‹ profileTools

Sites similar to avisheehan.com

Avi Sheehan Lighting Design Portfolio · ranked by shared content topics & relevance
72match
caelanmorris.com
HOME | Lighting Design
1 shared topicstheater
72match
madelineblondal.com
Madeline Blondal Set and Lighting Designer Portfolio
1 shared topicstheater
72match
lxgo.com
Philip Watson Lighting Design LLC.
1 shared topicstheater
71match
connorsale.com
Connor Sale Lighting Design
1 shared topicstheater
71match
sveinselvik.com
Svein Selvik Lighting Design
1 shared topicstheater
70match
gavanswift.com
Gavan Swift — Lighting Design
1 shared topicstheater
69match
caledoniagrant.com
Theatre Design & Management Portfolio
1 shared topicstheater
69match
beatumlighting.com
BEATUM Lighting | Lighting Designer Andreas Jensen
1 shared topicstheater
68match
angelosgounaras.com
Angelos Gounaras lighting | design
1 shared topicstheater
68match
plf-designstudios.com
PLF-DesignStudios-Scenic-Lighting Design
1 shared topicstheater
68match
rickpm.com
RICK MARTIN - Lighting & Scenic Design
1 shared topicstheater
68match
helenaadkins.com
Portfolio
1 shared topicstheater
67match
henrykacik.com
Henry Kacik — Lighting & Projection Designer
1 shared topicstheater
67match
cameolight.net
Cameo- Stage Lighting Designers – – a team of LIGHT minded people
1 shared topicstheater
67match
knowshowtomake.com
Stagecraft Portfolio
1 shared topicstheater
67match
ma-5.com
Oliver Webber | Lighting Designer / Programmer | Oliver Webber Lighting
1 shared topicstheater
66match
mollylitt.com
Molly Litt – My Acting Portfolio
1 shared topicstheater
66match
andielerner.com
Andie Lerner | Portfolio
1 shared topicstheater

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.